Differences between Amazon EFS and FSx

 The main differences between Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Amazon FSx are:

  1. Storage Technology:

    • EFS is a fully managed NFS file system, while FSx offers different file system options like FSx for Windows File Server, FSx for NetApp ONTAP, FSx for OpenZFS, and FSx for Lustre.
  2. Target Workloads:

    • EFS is well-suited for Linux-based applications that require a simple, scalable, and fully managed NFS file system.
    • FSx for Windows File Server is designed for Windows-based applications that require native Windows file system compatibility and features.
    • FSx for NetApp ONTAP, OpenZFS, and Lustre cater to specific high-performance, data-intensive workloads.
  3. Protocols and Accessibility:

    • EFS supports the NFS protocol and can be accessed from Linux, macOS, and Windows instances.
    • FSx file systems support various protocols like NFS, SMB, and iSCSI, depending on the specific FSx offering.
  4. Performance and Scalability:

    • EFS provides consistently low latencies and can scale on-demand to petabytes of data.
    • FSx offerings like FSx for Lustre and FSx for NetApp ONTAP can deliver higher performance and throughput for specific workloads.
  5. Data Management Features:

    • EFS provides basic file system management capabilities.
    • FSx for NetApp ONTAP offers advanced data management features like snapshots, clones, and replication.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Difference b/w General-purpose and a Directory bucket in Amazon S3

How to reduce the EBS snapshots storage cost

Difference between full snapshots and incremental snapshots

Snapshot storage tier types and cost difference

Where the EBS snapshot stores and snapshot charges

Key features of Amazon S3

Pros and cons of On-Demand, Reserved, Spot and Saving Plans EC2 instances

How burstable CPU performance works in T series EC2 instances

Differences between an IAM User and Role

AWS Storage types