Pros and cons of On-Demand, Reserved, Spot and Saving Plans EC2 instances

The pros and cons of the on-demand pricing model for EC2 instances are:
Pros:
  • Flexibility: On-demand instances allow you to scale your compute resources up or down as needed, without any long-term commitments.
  • No upfront costs: With on-demand, you only pay for the compute capacity you use, without any upfront payments or long-term contracts.
  • Suitable for unpredictable workloads: On-demand is well-suited for applications with short-term, spiky, or unpredictable workloads that cannot be interrupted.
  • Ideal for development and testing: On-demand instances are a good choice for workloads like pre-production environments, experiments, and proofs of concept.
Cons:
  • Higher costs for long-term, steady-state workloads: Compared to other pricing models like Reserved Instances or Savings Plans, on-demand instances can be more expensive for long-term, steady-state workloads.
  • No long-term discounts: On-demand instances do not offer any long-term discounts or commitments, unlike Reserved Instances or Savings Plans.
  • Potential for unexpected costs: With on-demand, you may face unexpected costs if your application's resource usage spikes unexpectedly.

The pros and cons of the Reserved Instances (RI) pricing model for EC2 instances are:
Pros:
  • Significant cost savings: RIs can provide up to 72% savings compared to on-demand pricing, depending on the upfront payment and term length.
  • Predictable costs: RIs allow you to lock in a lower effective hourly rate for a 1-year or 3-year term, making your costs more predictable.
  • Suitable for steady-state workloads: RIs are well-suited for applications with predictable, long-term usage patterns.
  • Flexibility: You can choose between All Upfront, Partial Upfront, or No Upfront payment options to match your budget and cash flow requirements.
  • Resale option: You can sell your unused RIs on the Reserved Instance Marketplace, providing an opportunity to recoup some of your investment.
Cons:
  • Upfront commitment: RIs require a 1-year or 3-year commitment, which may not be suitable for workloads with highly variable or unpredictable usage.
  • Limited flexibility: Once you purchase an RI, you are limited to the instance type, region, and other attributes specified in the reservation.
  • Potential for unused capacity: If your usage patterns change, you may end up with unused RI capacity, which can lead to wasted investment.
  • Complexity: Managing and optimizing your RI portfolio can be complex, especially as your infrastructure and usage patterns evolve.

The pros and cons of using Spot Instances on Amazon EC2 are:
Pros:
  • Significant cost savings: Spot Instances can provide discounts of up to 90% compared to On-Demand pricing, allowing you to significantly reduce the cost of running your applications.
  • Flexibility: Spot Instances do not require any long-term commitments, unlike Reserved Instances or Savings Plans, making them suitable for flexible, fault-tolerant workloads.
  • Increased compute capacity: You can use Spot Instances to grow your application's compute capacity and throughput for the same budget.
  • Suitability for certain workloads: Spot Instances are well-suited for workloads that are stateless, fault-tolerant, and can handle interruptions, such as batch processing, big data, and high-performance computing.
Cons:
  • Potential for interruptions: Spot Instances can be terminated by Amazon EC2 with a 2-minute notification when the capacity is needed for other purposes, which can disrupt your workloads.
  • Unsuitability for certain workloads: Spot Instances are not recommended for workloads that are inflexible, stateful, fault-intolerant, or tightly coupled between instance nodes.
  • Unpredictable availability: The availability of Spot Instances can vary significantly depending on the supply and demand for spare EC2 capacity, which can make it challenging to plan and manage your infrastructure.
  • Complexity: Effectively using Spot Instances may require more advanced techniques, such as using EC2 Auto Scaling, EC2 Fleet, or Spot Fleet, to manage the interruptions and maximize cost savings.

The pros and cons of the AWS Savings Plans pricing model are:
Pros:
  • Significant cost savings: Savings Plans can provide up to 72% savings compared to On-Demand pricing, depending on the commitment level and term length.
  • Flexibility: Savings Plans offer more flexibility than Reserved Instances, as they allow you to change instance families, regions, and even move workloads between services like EC2, Fargate, and Lambda while still benefiting from the discounted pricing.
  • Automatic application: Savings Plans automatically apply to your eligible usage, ensuring you always get the best pricing without manual intervention.
  • Predictable costs: The fixed hourly commitment provides more predictable costs compared to the variable On-Demand pricing.
  • Suitability for long-term, steady-state workloads: Savings Plans are well-suited for applications with predictable, long-term usage patterns.
Cons:
  • Upfront commitment: Savings Plans require a 1-year or 3-year commitment, which may not be suitable for workloads with highly variable or unpredictable usage.
  • Limited flexibility: Once you purchase a Savings Plan, you are limited to the specific usage commitment and cannot easily change it.
  • Complexity: Managing and optimizing your Savings Plan portfolio can be complex, especially as your infrastructure and usage patterns evolve.
  • Potential for unused capacity: If your usage patterns change, you may end up with unused Savings Plan capacity, which can lead to wasted investment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Difference b/w General-purpose and a Directory bucket in Amazon S3

How to reduce the EBS snapshots storage cost

Difference between full snapshots and incremental snapshots

Snapshot storage tier types and cost difference

Where the EBS snapshot stores and snapshot charges

Key features of Amazon S3

How burstable CPU performance works in T series EC2 instances

Differences between an IAM User and Role

AWS Storage types